Re: [PATCH v2 0/13] ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Updates on top of changesmerged recently

[Mika Westerberg]

On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 01:19:33AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, January 27, 2014 01:37:17 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Hi All,
> > 
> > ACPIPHP can be simplified a bit on top of some PCI and ACPI changes merged
> > recently and the following series of patches implements those simplifications:
> > 
> > [1/11] Fix up two kerneldoc comments in acpiphp_glue.c.
> > [2/11] Get rid of an unnecessary label in register_slot().
> > [3/11] Drop acpiphp_bus_trim() and use acpi_bus_trim() instead of it directly.
> > [4/11] Move the acpi_bus_get_device() call out of acpiphp_no_hotplug().
> > [5/11] Store struct acpi_device pointers instead of ACPI handles in struct acpiphp_context.
> > [6/11] Drop acpiphp_bus_add() (which has only one user).
> > [7/11] Drop crit_sect mutexes (that are redundant).
> > [8/11] Clean up the usage of the slot variable in hotplug_event().
> > [9/11] Drop dev_in_slot() and rework disable_slot() to walk bus->devices directly.
> > [10/11] Use acpi_handle_debug() in hotplug_event() instead of open-coded stuff.
> > [11/11] Drop handle argument from the member functions of struct acpi_dock_ops.
> > 
> > All of that is relateively straightforward, but I have some more intrusive changes
> > on top of it in the works.  They will be posted separately later this week.
> 
> I've learned a couple of things since I sent this patchset.  First, all
> bus->devices list walks that may remove PCI devices should be done in reverse
> order or they can crash if virtual functions are involved.  Second, hotplug_event()
> (in acpiphp_glue.c) has to acquire pci_rescan_remove_lock by itself, because it
> may be called from multiple places and all of them need that lock to be held.
> That is done by patches [1-2/13] which I'm planning to push as fixes for 3.14-rc2.
> 
> The rest is pretty much the same as last time except that the old patch [9/11]
> became [3/13] in this series and it has been changed so that the list is walked in
> reverse order.

On Intel NUC and DZ77RE-75K,

Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/