Re: [PATCH] pci: Add support for creating a generic host_bridge fromdevice tree

[Liviu Dudau]

Hi Arnd,

First of all, thanks for reviewing this!

On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 06:46:10PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 03 February 2014 18:33:48 Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > +/**
> > + * pci_host_bridge_of_get_ranges - Parse PCI host bridge resources from DT
> > + * @dev: device node of the host bridge having the range property
> > + * @resources: list where the range of resources will be added after DT parsing
> > + *
> > + * This function will parse the "ranges" property of a PCI host bridge device
> > + * node and setup the resource mapping based on its content. It is expected
> > + * that the property conforms with the Power ePAPR document.
> > + *
> > + * Each architecture will then apply their filtering based on the limitations
> > + * of each platform. One general restriction seems to be the number of IO space
> > + * ranges, the PCI framework makes intensive use of struct resource management,
> > + * and for IORESOURCE_IO types they can only be requested if they are contained
> > + * within the global ioport_resource, so that should be limited to one IO space
> > + * range.
> 
> Actually we have quite a different set of restrictions around I/O space on ARM32
> at the moment: Each host bridge can have its own 64KB range in an arbitrary
> location on MMIO space, and the total must not exceed 2MB of I/O space.

And that is why the filtering is not (yet) imposed in the generic code. But once
you use pci_request_region, that will call request_region which will check
against ioport_resource as parent for the requested resource. That should fail
if is is not in the correct range, so I don't know how arm arch code manages
multiple IO ranges.

> 
> > + */
> > +static int pci_host_bridge_of_get_ranges(struct device_node *dev,
> > +					struct list_head *resources)
> > +{
> > +	struct resource *res;
> > +	struct of_pci_range range;
> > +	struct of_pci_range_parser parser;
> > +	int err;
> > +
> > +	pr_info("PCI host bridge %s ranges:\n", dev->full_name);
> > +
> > +	/* Check for ranges property */
> > +	err = of_pci_range_parser_init(&parser, dev);
> > +	if (err)
> > +		return err;
> > +
> > +	pr_debug("Parsing ranges property...\n");
> > +	for_each_of_pci_range(&parser, &range) {
> > +		/* Read next ranges element */
> > +		pr_debug("pci_space: 0x%08x pci_addr:0x%016llx ",
> > +				range.pci_space, range.pci_addr);
> > +		pr_debug("cpu_addr:0x%016llx size:0x%016llx\n",
> > +					range.cpu_addr, range.size);
> > +
> > +		/* If we failed translation or got a zero-sized region
> > +		 * (some FW try to feed us with non sensical zero sized regions
> > +		 * such as power3 which look like some kind of attempt
> > +		 * at exposing the VGA memory hole) then skip this range
> > +		 */
> > +		if (range.cpu_addr == OF_BAD_ADDR || range.size == 0)
> > +			continue;
> > +
> > +		res = kzalloc(sizeof(struct resource), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +		if (!res) {
> > +			err = -ENOMEM;
> > +			goto bridge_ranges_nomem;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		of_pci_range_to_resource(&range, dev, res);
> > +
> > +		pci_add_resource_offset(resources, res,
> > +				range.cpu_addr - range.pci_addr);
> > +	}
> 
> I believe of_pci_range_to_resource() will return the MMIO aperture for the
> I/O space window here, which is not what you are supposed to pass into
> pci_add_resource_offset.

And that is why the code in probe.c has been added to deal with that. It is
too early to do the adjustments here as all we have is the list of resources
and that might get culled by the architecture fixup code. Remembering the
io_offset will happen once the pci_host_bridge gets created, and the resources
are then adjusted.

> 
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_host_bridge_of_init);
> 
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL

Will change for v2, thanks!

> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> > index 6e34498..16febae 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> > @@ -1787,6 +1787,17 @@ struct pci_bus *pci_create_root_bus(struct device *parent, int bus,
> >  	list_for_each_entry_safe(window, n, resources, list) {
> >  		list_move_tail(&window->list, &bridge->windows);
> >  		res = window->res;
> > +		/*
> > +		 * IO resources are stored in the kernel with a CPU start
> > +		 * address of zero. Adjust the data accordingly and remember
> > +		 * the offset
> > +		 */
> > +		if (resource_type(res) == IORESOURCE_IO) {
> > +			bridge->io_offset = res->start;
> > +			res->end -= res->start;
> > +			window->offset -= res->start;
> > +			res->start = 0;
> > +		}
> >  		offset = window->offset;
> >  		if (res->flags & IORESOURCE_BUS)
> 
> Won't this break all existing host bridges?

I am not sure. I believe not, due to what I've explained earlier, but you might be right.

The adjustment happens before the resource is added to the host bridge windows and translates
it from MMIO range into IO range.

Best regards,
Liviu

> 
> 	Arnd
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
> 

-- 
====================
| I would like to |
| fix the world,  |
| but they're not |
| giving me the   |
 \ source code!  /
  ---------------
    Â\_(ã)_/Â

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/