Re: [PATCH v2] ceph: fix posix ACL hooks

[Al Viro]

On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 09:39:26PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:

> Which fs are you talking about?  For 9P it *is* a function of inode alone.
> For CIFS there's no wrong dentry to pick - it doesn't have links to start
> with.

Except that apparently it does ;-/  Bugger...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/