Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] can: sja1000: cleanups and new OF property

From: Andreas Larsson
Date: Tue Feb 04 2014 - 03:20:14 EST


On 2014-01-31 14:50, Andreas Larsson wrote:
On 2014-01-31 14:40, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
On 01/31/2014 02:34 PM, Florian Vaussard wrote:
Hello,

(could someone with a SJA1000 on SPARC perform a functional test
to see if interrupts are working? it would be great :-)

Changes since v2:
- Dropped patch 1 "can: sja1000: remove unused defines"
- Addressed Marc's comments on patch 4 and 6 (now 3 and 5)

Changes since v1:
- Merge sja1000_of_platform.c into sja1000_platform.c (patch 4)

The first part of this series performs serveral small cleanups
(patches 1 and 2).

Patch 3 merges sja1000_of_platform.c into sja1000_platform.c.
Changes are pretty conservatives (mostly copy/paste/move). IRQ
is treated differently in the OF and non-OF versions, thus this
is where the fused version differs the most.

The final part introduces the 'reg-io-width' binding (already used
by some other drivers) to perform a similar job as what was done
with IORESOURCE_MEM_XXBIT. This is needed on my system to correctly
take into account the aliasing of the address bus.

All patches were tested using OF boot on my OMAP3 system with a
memory-mapped SJA1000. Thus, the non-OF path is not tested, as
I do not have a platform data at hand.

Nice, looks good now. I'll give Andreas some time to test on sparc and
then apply the patches.


I am on it. I will dig up some hardware for this on Monday to test it.

Works splendidly. You can add:

Tested-by: Andreas Larsson <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Cheers,
Andreas Larsson

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/