Re: [RFC 07/16] drm/nouveau/bar/nvc0: support chips without BAR3

From: Alexandre Courbot
Date: Tue Feb 04 2014 - 03:32:07 EST


On 02/04/2014 12:54 PM, Ben Skeggs wrote:
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Adapt the NVC0 BAR driver to make it able to support chips that do not
expose a BAR3. When this happens, BAR1 is then used for USERD mapping
and the BAR alloc() functions is disabled, making GPU objects unable
to rely on BAR for data access and falling back to PRAMIN.

Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/bar/nvc0.c | 115 +++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/bar/nvc0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/bar/nvc0.c
index 3f30db6..c2bb0e5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/bar/nvc0.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/bar/nvc0.c
@@ -79,87 +79,88 @@ nvc0_bar_unmap(struct nouveau_bar *bar, struct nouveau_vma *vma)
}

static int
-nvc0_bar_ctor(struct nouveau_object *parent, struct nouveau_object *engine,
- struct nouveau_oclass *oclass, void *data, u32 size,
- struct nouveau_object **pobject)
+nvc0_bar_init_vm(struct nvc0_bar_priv *priv, int nr, int bar)
{
- struct nouveau_device *device = nv_device(parent);
- struct nvc0_bar_priv *priv;
+ struct nouveau_device *device = nv_device(&priv->base);
struct nouveau_gpuobj *mem;
struct nouveau_vm *vm;
+ resource_size_t bar_len;
int ret;

- ret = nouveau_bar_create(parent, engine, oclass, &priv);
- *pobject = nv_object(priv);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
-
- /* BAR3 */
ret = nouveau_gpuobj_new(nv_object(priv), NULL, 0x1000, 0, 0,
- &priv->bar[0].mem);
- mem = priv->bar[0].mem;
+ &priv->bar[nr].mem);
+ mem = priv->bar[nr].mem;
if (ret)
return ret;

ret = nouveau_gpuobj_new(nv_object(priv), NULL, 0x8000, 0, 0,
- &priv->bar[0].pgd);
+ &priv->bar[nr].pgd);
if (ret)
return ret;

- ret = nouveau_vm_new(device, 0, nv_device_resource_len(device, 3), 0, &vm);
+ bar_len = nv_device_resource_len(device, bar);
+
+ ret = nouveau_vm_new(device, 0, bar_len, 0, &vm);
if (ret)
return ret;

atomic_inc(&vm->engref[NVDEV_SUBDEV_BAR]);

- ret = nouveau_gpuobj_new(nv_object(priv), NULL,
- (nv_device_resource_len(device, 3) >> 12) * 8,
- 0x1000, NVOBJ_FLAG_ZERO_ALLOC,
- &vm->pgt[0].obj[0]);
- vm->pgt[0].refcount[0] = 1;
- if (ret)
- return ret;
+ /*
+ * Bootstrap page table lookup.
+ */
+ if (bar == 3) {
+ ret = nouveau_gpuobj_new(nv_object(priv), NULL,
+ (bar_len >> 12) * 8, 0x1000,
+ NVOBJ_FLAG_ZERO_ALLOC,
+ &vm->pgt[0].obj[0]);
+ vm->pgt[0].refcount[0] = 1;
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }

- ret = nouveau_vm_ref(vm, &priv->bar[0].vm, priv->bar[0].pgd);
+ ret = nouveau_vm_ref(vm, &priv->bar[nr].vm, priv->bar[nr].pgd);
nouveau_vm_ref(NULL, &vm, NULL);
if (ret)
return ret;

- nv_wo32(mem, 0x0200, lower_32_bits(priv->bar[0].pgd->addr));
- nv_wo32(mem, 0x0204, upper_32_bits(priv->bar[0].pgd->addr));
- nv_wo32(mem, 0x0208, lower_32_bits(nv_device_resource_len(device, 3) - 1));
- nv_wo32(mem, 0x020c, upper_32_bits(nv_device_resource_len(device, 3) - 1));
+ nv_wo32(mem, 0x0200, lower_32_bits(priv->bar[nr].pgd->addr));
+ nv_wo32(mem, 0x0204, upper_32_bits(priv->bar[nr].pgd->addr));
+ nv_wo32(mem, 0x0208, lower_32_bits(bar_len - 1));
+ nv_wo32(mem, 0x020c, upper_32_bits(bar_len - 1));

- /* BAR1 */
- ret = nouveau_gpuobj_new(nv_object(priv), NULL, 0x1000, 0, 0,
- &priv->bar[1].mem);
- mem = priv->bar[1].mem;
- if (ret)
- return ret;
+ return 0;
+}

- ret = nouveau_gpuobj_new(nv_object(priv), NULL, 0x8000, 0, 0,
- &priv->bar[1].pgd);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
+static int
+nvc0_bar_ctor(struct nouveau_object *parent, struct nouveau_object *engine,
+ struct nouveau_oclass *oclass, void *data, u32 size,
+ struct nouveau_object **pobject)
+{
+ struct nouveau_device *device = nv_device(parent);
+ struct nvc0_bar_priv *priv;
+ bool has_bar3 = nv_device_resource_len(device, 3) != 0;
+ int ret;

- ret = nouveau_vm_new(device, 0, nv_device_resource_len(device, 1), 0, &vm);
+ ret = nouveau_bar_create(parent, engine, oclass, &priv);
+ *pobject = nv_object(priv);
if (ret)
return ret;

- atomic_inc(&vm->engref[NVDEV_SUBDEV_BAR]);
+ /* BAR3 */
+ if (has_bar3) {
+ ret = nvc0_bar_init_vm(priv, 0, 3);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ priv->base.alloc = nouveau_bar_alloc;
+ priv->base.kmap = nvc0_bar_kmap;
+ }

- ret = nouveau_vm_ref(vm, &priv->bar[1].vm, priv->bar[1].pgd);
- nouveau_vm_ref(NULL, &vm, NULL);
+ /* BAR1 */
+ ret = nvc0_bar_init_vm(priv, 1, 1);
if (ret)
return ret;

- nv_wo32(mem, 0x0200, lower_32_bits(priv->bar[1].pgd->addr));
- nv_wo32(mem, 0x0204, upper_32_bits(priv->bar[1].pgd->addr));
- nv_wo32(mem, 0x0208, lower_32_bits(nv_device_resource_len(device, 1) - 1));
- nv_wo32(mem, 0x020c, upper_32_bits(nv_device_resource_len(device, 1) - 1));
-
- priv->base.alloc = nouveau_bar_alloc;
- priv->base.kmap = nvc0_bar_kmap;
priv->base.umap = nvc0_bar_umap;
priv->base.unmap = nvc0_bar_unmap;
priv->base.flush = nv84_bar_flush;
@@ -176,12 +177,16 @@ nvc0_bar_dtor(struct nouveau_object *object)
nouveau_gpuobj_ref(NULL, &priv->bar[1].pgd);
nouveau_gpuobj_ref(NULL, &priv->bar[1].mem);

- if (priv->bar[0].vm) {
- nouveau_gpuobj_ref(NULL, &priv->bar[0].vm->pgt[0].obj[0]);
- nouveau_vm_ref(NULL, &priv->bar[0].vm, priv->bar[0].pgd);
+ if (priv->bar[0].mem) {
+ if (priv->bar[0].vm) {
+ nouveau_gpuobj_ref(NULL,
+ &priv->bar[0].vm->pgt[0].obj[0]);
+ nouveau_vm_ref(NULL, &priv->bar[0].vm,
+ priv->bar[0].pgd);
+ }
+ nouveau_gpuobj_ref(NULL, &priv->bar[0].pgd);
+ nouveau_gpuobj_ref(NULL, &priv->bar[0].mem);
}
- nouveau_gpuobj_ref(NULL, &priv->bar[0].pgd);
- nouveau_gpuobj_ref(NULL, &priv->bar[0].mem);
Did the conditional on priv->bar[0].mem fix anything here? The ref()
functions called are designed to handle the NULL pointers already.

You're right, this test is not needed at all. Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/