Re: [PATCH] fdtable: Avoid triggering OOMs from alloc_fdmem

[Eric W. Biederman]

Cong Wang <cwang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 9:26 PM, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> diff --git a/fs/file.c b/fs/file.c
>> index 771578b33fb6..db25c2bdfe46 100644
>> --- a/fs/file.c
>> +++ b/fs/file.c
>> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ static void *alloc_fdmem(size_t size)
>>          * vmalloc() if the allocation size will be considered "large" by the VM.
>>          */
>>         if (size <= (PAGE_SIZE << PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER)) {
>> -               void *data = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_NOWARN);
>> +               void *data = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_NOWARN|__GFP_NORETRY);
>>                 if (data != NULL)
>>                         return data;
>>         }
>
> Or try again without __GFP_NORETRY like we do in nelink mmap?

I think I would much rather keep the current semantics of return -ENOMEM
and keep the problem localized then trigger a box wide OOM thank you
very much.


Retrying the kmalloc without __GFP_NORETRY is pointless.  If you are in
the unlikely 0.01% of the time when the kmalloc fails it is almost
certainly going to fail again.  Writing out_of_memory() as kmalloc()
is pointless and very confusing.

The vmalloc won't fail unless you are on a 32bit box.  So it isn't a
case that anyone has to deal with in practice.

Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/