Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Deferrable timers support for timerfd API

[Alexey Perevalov]

On 02/07/2014 12:50 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Alexey Perevalov wrote:
> > On 02/06/2014 02:16 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > As I truly understand, you decided - flags is better than new clockids, and
> > internals of timerfd could be a mix of timer_list and hrtimer.
> NO, NO, NO, NO. There is no mix of timer_list and hrtimer. Either we
> add proper deferrable support to hrtimers or the whole thing is not
> going to happen at all. There is no way that we bring back timer_list
> to user space interfaces. Period.
>
> Thanks,
>
> 	tglx
Ok, thank you, I'll work with you patch for hrtimers, and I'll rework 
current patch set.


--
Best regards,
Alexey Perevalov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/