Re: [PATCH 9/9] mm: Remove ifdef condition in include/linux/mm.h
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Fri Feb 07 2014 - 17:30:59 EST
On Fri, 7 Feb 2014 13:15:29 -0800 (PST) David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Josh Triplett wrote:
>
> > > > diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> > > > index 1cedd00..5f8348f 100644
> > > > --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> > > > +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> > > > @@ -1589,10 +1589,8 @@ static inline int __early_pfn_to_nid(unsigned long pfn)
> > > > #else
> > > > /* please see mm/page_alloc.c */
> > > > extern int __meminit early_pfn_to_nid(unsigned long pfn);
> > > > -#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_EARLY_PFN_TO_NID
> > > > /* there is a per-arch backend function. */
> > > > extern int __meminit __early_pfn_to_nid(unsigned long pfn);
> > > > -#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_EARLY_PFN_TO_NID */
> > > > #endif
> > > >
> > > > extern void set_dma_reserve(unsigned long new_dma_reserve);
> > >
> > > Wouldn't it be better to just declare the __early_pfn_to_nid() in
> > > mm/page_alloc.c to be static?
> >
> > Won't that break the ability to override that function in
> > architecture-specific code (as arch/ia64/mm/numa.c does)?
> >
>
> Why? CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_EARLY_PFN_TO_NID should define where this function
> is defined so ia64 should have it set and the definition which I'm
> suggesting be static is only compiled when this is undefined in
> mm/page_alloc.c. I'm not sure why we'd want to be messing with the
> declaration?
__early_pfn_to_nid() must be global if it is implemented in arch/.
Making it static when it is implemented in core mm makes a bit of
sense, in that it cleans up the non-ia64 namespace and discourages
usage from other compilation units. But it's is a bit odd and
unexpected to do such a thing. I'm inclined to happily nuke the ifdef
then go think about something else ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/