RE: [PATCH 0/5] Enabling the asynchronous threads for other phases

[Liu, Chuansheng]

Hello Rafael,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 5:53 AM
> To: Liu, Chuansheng
> Cc: gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; pavel@xxxxxx; Brown, Len;
> linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Li, Zhuangzhi
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Enabling the asynchronous threads for other phases
> 
> On Monday, January 20, 2014 04:44:34 PM Liu, Chuansheng wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > This patch series are for enabling the asynchronous threads for the phases
> > resume_noirq, resume_early, suspend_noirq and suspend_late.
> >
> > Just like commit 5af84b82701a and 97df8c12995, with async threads it will
> > reduce the system suspending and resuming time significantly.
> >
> > With these patches, in my test platform, it saved 80% time in resume_noirq
> > phase.
> >
> > Has done the suspend-resume stress test for a long time, please help to
> > review.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > [PATCH 1/5] PM: Adding two flags for async suspend_noirq and
> > [PATCH 2/5] PM: Enabling the asynchronous threads for resume_noirq
> > [PATCH 3/5] PM: Enabling the asyncronous threads for resume_early
> > [PATCH 4/5] PM: Enabling the asyncronous threads for suspend_noirq
> > [PATCH 5/5] PM: Enabling the asyncronous threads for suspend_late
> 
> I've applied this to the bleeding-edge branch of the linux-pm.git tree, with
> minor changes related to coding style, white space etc.
Thanks your help.

> 
> Can you please verify that the bleeding-edge branch works for you as
> expected?
I have picked them from your bleeding-edge branch and has done the
suspend-resume stress test for about 200 times and 3 hours,
It is still working well.

Best Regards
Chuansheng Liu
N‹§²æìr¸›yúèšØb²X¬¶ÇvØ^–)Þ{.nÇ+‰·¥Š{±‘êçzX§¶›¡Ü}©ž²ÆzÚ&j:+v‰¨¾«‘êçzZ+€Ê+zf£¢·hšˆ§~†­†Ûiÿûàz¹®w¥¢¸?™¨è­Ú&¢)ßf”ù^jÇy§m…á@A«a¶Úÿ0¶ìh®å’i