Re: [PATCH] staging : android : fix checkpatch issues

[DaeSeok Youn]

Thanks for reviewing.

Yes, I just followed by reports of checkpatch.pl.

But I don't understand why I can use of seq_puts() in the middle of
seq_printf() calls.
I have been trying to search why that is not good but I didn't find
anything about that.
And I saw patches which were already merged similar with this patch.

You can see with this url
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/2d219c518882d2b2bac77742a6a8979c9dad051a
https://github.com/mirrors/linux-2.6/commit/7aff38176e79a22b1749c2af74060028298e6a45

If you don't mind, let me know why it is not good.

Thanks.
Daeseok Youn

2014-02-10 18:11 GMT+09:00 Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:59:14AM +0900, Daeseok Youn wrote:
>> @@ -1376,14 +1376,14 @@ static int ion_debug_heap_show(struct seq_file *s, void *unused)
>>               }
>>       }
>>       mutex_unlock(&dev->buffer_lock);
>> -     seq_printf(s, "----------------------------------------------------\n");
>> +     seq_puts(s, "----------------------------------------------------\n");
>>       seq_printf(s, "%16.s %16zu\n", "total orphaned",
>>                  total_orphaned_size);
>
> This kind of thing where you put a seq_puts() in the middle of a string
> of seq_printf() calls is not good.  We only make checkpatch.pl warn
> about it to see if patch submitters are paying attention and to test the
> patience of reviewers.
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/