Re: [PATCH 1/1] block: rework flush sequencing for blk-mq

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 08:55:07AM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> Yep, none driver needs it. But reverse mapping is the one of the points we use
> tag, so better we prepare it.

I don't think adding unused code to tree for a future driver is a good
idea, although I'm happy to help out with the functionality as soon
as the need arrives.

In the meantime we really need something like this fix to allow
non-trivial drivers to use blk-mq.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/