Re: [PATCH 01/21] perf c2c: Shared data analyser

From: Don Zickus
Date: Tue Feb 11 2014 - 09:37:32 EST


On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 08:31:27AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 02:10:04PM -0800, Davidlohr Bueso escreveu:
> > On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 14:18 -0500, Don Zickus wrote:
> > > From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > This is the start of a new perf tool that will collect information about
> > > memory accesses and analyse it to find things like hot cachelines, etc.
> > >
> > > This is basically trying to get a prototype written by Richard Fowles
> > > written using the tools/perf coding style and libraries.
> > >
> > > Start it from 'perf sched', this patch starts the process by adding the
> > > 'record' subcommand to collect the needed mem loads and stores samples.
> > >
> > > It also have the basic 'report' skeleton, resolving the sample address
> > > and hooking the events found in a perf.data file with methods to handle
> > > them, right now just printing the resolved perf_sample data structure
> > > after each event name.
> >
> > What tree/branch is this developed against? I'm getting the following
> > with Linus' latest and tip tree:
>
> I'll try refreshing it on top of my perf/core branch today

Sorry for the trouble. I guess I missed all the function cleanups from
last month. Attached is a patch that gets things to compile.

I'll split this patch up to the right spots on my next refresh.

Cheers,
Don

diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-c2c.c b/tools/perf/builtin-c2c.c
index a73535a..b55f281 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-c2c.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-c2c.c
@@ -1009,15 +1009,20 @@ static int perf_c2c__process_sample(struct perf_tool *tool,
struct c2c_entry *entry;
sample_handler f;
int err = -1;
+ struct addr_location al = {
+ .machine = machine,
+ .cpumode = cpumode,
+ };

- if (evsel->handler.func == NULL)
+ if (evsel->handler == NULL)
return 0;

thread = machine__find_thread(machine, sample->pid);
if (thread == NULL)
goto err;

- mi = machine__resolve_mem(machine, thread, sample, cpumode);
+ al.thread = thread;
+ mi = sample__resolve_mem(sample, &al);
if (mi == NULL)
goto err;

@@ -1031,7 +1036,7 @@ static int perf_c2c__process_sample(struct perf_tool *tool,
if (entry == NULL)
goto err_mem;

- f = evsel->handler.func;
+ f = evsel->handler;
err = f(c2c, sample, entry);
if (err)
goto err_entry;
@@ -1040,8 +1045,8 @@ static int perf_c2c__process_sample(struct perf_tool *tool,
if (symbol_conf.use_callchain && sample->callchain) {
callchain_init(entry->callchain);

- err = machine__resolve_callchain(machine, evsel, thread,
- sample, &parent, NULL);
+ err = sample__resolve_callchain(sample, &parent, evsel, &al,
+ PERF_MAX_STACK_DEPTH);
if (!err)
err = callchain_append(entry->callchain,
&callchain_cursor,
@@ -1198,7 +1203,7 @@ struct refs {
struct list_head list;
int nr;
const char *name;
- char *long_name;
+ const char *long_name;
};

static int update_ref_tree(struct c2c_entry *entry)
@@ -2732,8 +2737,12 @@ static int perf_c2c__read_events(struct perf_c2c *c2c)
{
int err = -1;
struct perf_session *session;
+ struct perf_data_file file = {
+ .path = input_name,
+ .mode = PERF_DATA_MODE_READ,
+ };

- session = perf_session__new(input_name, O_RDONLY, 0, false, &c2c->tool);
+ session = perf_session__new(&file, 0, &c2c->tool);
if (session == NULL) {
pr_debug("No memory for session\n");
goto out;
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evlist.c b/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
index faf29b0..49e0328 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
@@ -1270,10 +1270,10 @@ int __perf_evlist__set_handlers(struct perf_evlist *evlist,
if (evsel == NULL)
continue;

- if (evsel->handler.func != NULL)
+ if (evsel->handler != NULL)
goto out;

- evsel->handler.func = assocs[i].handler;
+ evsel->handler = assocs[i].handler;
}

err = 0;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/