Re: [PATCH 5/9] rcu: Use MAX_NICE to replace hard coding of 19.

[Paul E. McKenney]

On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 05:42:30PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 08:13:13AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 07:37:32AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 03:34:49PM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
> > > > Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > cc: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > I get complaints about MAX_NICE being undefined, and I don't see any
> > definition of MAX_NICE in sched.h as of 3.14-rc2.  Am I looking in
> > the wrong place, or is this symbol not yet quite in mainline?
> 
> It is not.. its a proposed thingy. I'm still trying to make up my mind
> on it.

OK, will hold off then.

							Thanx, Paul

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/