Re: [3.13.2] list passed to list_sort() too long for efficiency.

[PaweÅ Sikora]

On Wednesday 12 of February 2014 13:03:56 Dave Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 06:59:07PM +0100, PaweÅ Sikora wrote:
>  > On Wednesday 12 of February 2014 09:46:26 Joe Perches wrote:
>  > > On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 18:16 +0100, PaweÅ Sikora wrote:
>  > > > [16855.582522] list passed to list_sort() too long for efficiency
>  > > > 
>  > > > could someone put some light on the last line?
>  > > 
>  > > Did you look at the list_sort function in lib/list_sort.c?
>  > > 
>  > > (granted the dmesg is harder to find that it should be
>  > > 
>  > >  because the format is split)
>  > > 
>  > > It just means it's slower than it could otherwise be
>  > 
>  > thanks,
>  > so without a stacktrace in dmesg we can't isolate a root of cause :/
> 
> The commit message mentions xfs and ubifs have long lists that get
> passed in. Do you use either of those ?

this is a test-farm server which utilizes only cpu/ext4/nfs/lvm/mdadm.

-- 
gpg key fingerprint = 60B4 9886 AD53 EB3E 88BB 1EB5 C52E D01B 683B 9411
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/