Re: [PATCH 1/3] ath10k: Get rid of superfluous call to pci_disable_msi()

[Bjorn Helgaas]

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>>> Well, as this series is small I thought it could quickly go thru your
>>> tree. But since ipr had conflicts, there is no point routing all patches
>>> altogether, so up to you guys. The wil6210 patch is already in your pci/msi
>>> branch though.
>>
>> It's in pci/msi, but that's not in my -next branch yet, so I can
>> easily drop it.  Do drivers/net/wireless patches normally follow a
>> different path than the other drivers/net patches?  The wil6210 and
>> ath10k patches look just like the others in the 34-patch series (bnx2,
>> bnx2x, tg3, bna, cxgb3, etc.), so I thought it would make more sense
>> to include them there.
>
> ath10k patches normally go through my ath.git tree to Linville and then
> to David Miller. To avoid conflicts I would prefer to take ath10k
> patches to my tree whenever possible.

OK, I won't do anything with ath10k (I haven't applied it anywhere).
And if Alexander re-posts the networking series (I think he might, to
add a pci_enable_msix_exact() interface), maybe he can include wil6210
with that series.

Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/