Re: [RFC] dt: bindings: add bindings for Broadcom bcm43xx sdio devices
From: Chen-Yu Tsai
Date: Thu Feb 13 2014 - 02:42:29 EST
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:17 AM, Arend van Spriel <arend@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The Broadcom bcm43xx sdio devices are fullmac devices that may be
> integrated in ARM platforms. Currently, the brcmfmac driver for
> these devices support use of platform data. This patch specifies
> the bindings that allow this platform data to be expressed in the
> devicetree.
>
> Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Hante Meuleman <meuleman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Pieter-Paul Giesberts <pieterpg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Arend van Spriel <arend@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> This devicetree binding proposal is intended for platforms with
> Broadcom wireless device in MMC sdio slot. These devices may
> have their own interrupt and power line. Also the SDIO drive
> strength is often hardware dependent and expressed in this
> binding.
Hi,
I believe the interrupts and drive-strength properties are Ok.
However, letting the platform driver power up the wifi chip does
not guarantee proper ordering, does it? I mean, what if the MMC
bus was probed before the (non-removable) chip was switched on?
Being able to tie that to the mmc controller would be better IMO.
I think this was discussed in Olof's "mmc: add support for
power-on sequencing through DT" thread.
Thanks!
ChenYu
>
> Not sure if this should go in staging or not. Feel free to
> comment on this proposal.
>
> Regards,
> Arend
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/