Re: [PATCH V2 3/3] sched: Move idle_stamp up to the core

[Alex Shi]

On 02/07/2014 07:10 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> The idle_balance modifies the idle_stamp field of the rq, making this
> information to be shared across core.c and fair.c. As we can know if the
> cpu is going to idle or not with the previous patch, let's encapsulate the
> idle_stamp information in core.c by moving it up to the caller. The
> idle_balance function returns true in case a balancing occured and the cpu
> won't be idle, false if no balance happened and the cpu is going idle.
> 
> Cc: mingo@xxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: alex.shi@xxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@xxxxxxxxxx>



-- 
Thanks
    Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/