Re: 3.14.0-rc2: WARNING: at mm/slub.c:1007
From: Christian Kujau
Date: Thu Feb 13 2014 - 20:22:25 EST
On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 at 12:14, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > OK, so the "possible irq lock inversion dependency detected" is a lockdep
> > regression, as you explained in the xfs-list thread. What about the
> > "RECLAIM_FS-safe -> RECLAIM_FS-unsafe lock order detected" warning - I
> > haven't seen it again though, only once with 3.14.0-rc2.
>
> That was also an i_lock/mmapsem issue, so it's likely to be the same
> root cause. I'm testing a fix for it at the moment.
Understood. Thanks for looking into this.
Christian.
--
BOFH excuse #129:
The ring needs another token
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/