Re: [PATCH] sched/deadline: Fix bad accounting of nr_running

[Steven Rostedt]

On Sat, 15 Feb 2014 10:52:07 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 11:59:46PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> > index 0dd5e09..84c2454 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> > @@ -844,14 +844,14 @@ static void __dequeue_task_dl(struct rq *rq,
> > struct task_struct *p, int flags) {
> >  	dequeue_dl_entity(&p->dl);
> >  	dequeue_pushable_dl_task(rq, p);
> > +
> > +	dec_nr_running(rq);
> >  }
> >  
> >  static void dequeue_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int
> > flags) {
> >  	update_curr_dl(rq);
> >  	__dequeue_task_dl(rq, p, flags);
> > -
> > -	dec_nr_running(rq);
> >  }
> >  
> >  /*
> 
> That patch is so line-wrapped... tskk!

Damn it, That's claws mail. It inserts files (patches) fine, but if you
go and modify something, it decides to "autowrap" the entire file.
That's one of the things I need to fix when I get the time (I've
downloaded the source as this frustrates the hell out of me). The
autowrapping is the thing that I hate most about this client.

I'll send out a new patch later :-/

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/