Re: 3.14-rc2 XFS backtrace because irqs_disabled.

[Dave Jones]

On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 09:23:56AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
 
 > There's a pretty massive difference between the actual stack usage
 > of the local variables and the amount of stack being used by the
 > compiled code.
 > 
 > What it appears to be is that the compiler is pushing 6-10 registers
 > to the stack on every function call. So a function that only has 3
 > local variables and does very little but allocate a structure and
 > call other functions saves an 6 registers to the stack before it
 > starts:

I've got a shitload of debug options enabled, which may explain it.
Or perhaps that new STACK_PROTECTOR_STRONG stuff ?

	Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/