Re: [PATCH] hwmon: twl4030-madc-hwmon: Add device tree support.

From: Guenter Roeck
Date: Sun Feb 16 2014 - 11:40:07 EST


On 02/14/2014 06:08 AM, Belisko Marek wrote:
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 01:20:58PM +0000, Marek Belisko wrote:
Signed-off-by: Marek Belisko <marek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/twl4030-madc-hwmon.txt | 9 +++++++++
drivers/hwmon/twl4030-madc-hwmon.c | 10 ++++++++++
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/twl4030-madc-hwmon.txt

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/twl4030-madc-hwmon.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/twl4030-madc-hwmon.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e8016d1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/twl4030-madc-hwmon.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+TWL4030 MADC hwmon.
+
+Required properties:
+- compatible: "ti,twl4030-madc-hwmon"
+
+Example:
+madc-hwmon {
+ compatible = "ti,twl4030-madc-hwmon";
+};

Huh?

What is this a binding for? From a look at the driver in mainline this
just calls into functions from the twl4030 madc driver (which doesn't
seem to have a binding).
I post bindings for twl4030-madc [1]. Without probing this driver
other things will not work (twl4030-madc-battery e.g.).
Is there better way to handle this situation?

Since you are converting twl4030-madc to be an iio driver,
can't you simply use the iio_hwmon bridge and declare this driver
obsolete ?

Guenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/