Re: [PATCH -tip RESEND 2/2] ftrace: Introduce nr_saved_cmdlines I/F

[Namhyung Kim]

Hi Yoshihiro,

On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 13:57:13 +0900, Yoshihiro YUNOMAE wrote:
> Hi Namhyung,
>
> (2014/02/14 13:50), Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> Hi Yoshihiro,
>> 
>> On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:28:58 +0900, Yoshihiro YUNOMAE wrote:
>>> Introduce nr_saved_cmdlines I/F for changing the number of pid-comm list.
>>> saved_cmdlines can store 128 command names using SAVED_CMDLINES now, but
>>> 'no-existing processes' names are often lost in saved_cmdlines when we
>>> read trace data. So, by introducing nr_saved_cmdlines I/F, the rule storing
>>> 128 command names is changed to the command numbers defined users.
>>>
>>> When we write a value to nr_saved_cmdlines, the number of the value will
>>> be stored in pid-comm list:
>>>
>>> 	# echo 1024 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/nr_saved_cmdlines
>>>
>>> Here, 1024 command names are stored. The default number is 128 and the maximum
>>> number is PID_MAX_DEFAULT (=32768 if CONFIG_BASE_SMALL is not set). So, if we
>>> want to avoid to lose command names, we need to set 32768 to nr_saved_cmdlines.
>>>
>>> We can read the maximum number of the list:
>>>
>>> 	# cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/nr_saved_cmdlines
>>> 	128
>> 
>> [SNIP]
>>> @@ -3685,7 +3760,8 @@ static void *saved_cmdlines_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *pos)
>>>   
>>>   	(*pos)++;
>>>   
>>> -	for (; ptr < &map_cmdline_to_pid[SAVED_CMDLINES]; ptr++) {
>>> +	for (; ptr < &savedcmd->map_cmdline_to_pid[savedcmd->cmdline_num];
>>> +	     ptr++) {
>>>   		if (*ptr == -1 || *ptr == NO_CMDLINE_MAP)
>>>   			continue;
>>>   
>>> @@ -3700,7 +3776,7 @@ static void *saved_cmdlines_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
>>>   	void *v;
>>>   	loff_t l = 0;
>>>   
>>> -	v = &map_cmdline_to_pid[0];
>>> +	v = &savedcmd->map_cmdline_to_pid[0];
>>>   	while (l <= *pos) {
>>>   		v = saved_cmdlines_next(m, v, &l);
>>>   		if (!v)
>> 
>> Are you accessing the savecmd without trace_cmdline_lock?
>
> It does not need to get trace_cmdline_lock here.
> The elements of map_pid_to_cmdline[] and saved_cmdlines[] are protected
> by trace_cmdline_lock in trace_find_cmdline(), but on the other hand
> map_cmdline_to_pid[] are not protected. There are no problems in
> particular. This is because map_cmdline_to_pid[] always refers to a
> valid process name or "<...>".

I don't get it.  What does protect the savedcmd from being changed
during reading "saved_cmdlines" file with changing "nr_saved_cmdlines"?

Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/