Re: [tip:x86/vdso] x86, vdso: Instead of dummy functions, include < linux/spinlock_up.h>

[H. Peter Anvin]

On 02/16/2014 11:42 PM, Stefani Seibold wrote:
> I think for the first time it will be okay to kick out the
> _ASM_X86_SPINLOCK_H hack and accept the C=1 warnings.
>
> At next step it is necessary to make the whole BUILD_VDSO32 path in
> vclock_gettime.c independent from the kernel headers, only uapi/ should
> be included.
>
> The use of cycle_t must be replaced with u64.
>
> We need a own copy of __native_read_tsc(), __iter_div_u64_rem, smp_rmb()
> and cpu_relax().

All of which are quite trivial.

> For the non BUILD_VDSO32 path we must only move the #includes inside
> this #ifndef BUILD_VDSO32

Sorry, didn't quite follow that.

	-hpa


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/