Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] HID: remove hid_get_raw_report in struct hid_device

From: Jiri Kosina
Date: Mon Feb 17 2014 - 08:15:38 EST


On Wed, 5 Feb 2014, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:

> dev->hid_get_raw_report(X) and hid_hw_raw_request(X, HID_REQ_GET_REPORT)
> are strictly equivalent. Switch the hid subsystem to the hid_hw notation
> and remove the field .hid_get_raw_report in struct hid_device.
>
> Reviewed-by: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/hid/hid-input.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/hid/hid-sony.c | 3 ++-
> drivers/hid/hidraw.c | 7 ++++---
> drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c | 1 -
> drivers/hid/uhid.c | 1 -
> drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c | 1 -
> include/linux/hid.h | 3 ---
> net/bluetooth/hidp/core.c | 1 -
> 8 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-input.c b/drivers/hid/hid-input.c
> index 68db2db..6253e95 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-input.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-input.c
> @@ -350,9 +350,9 @@ static int hidinput_get_battery_property(struct power_supply *psy,
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> break;
> }
> - ret = dev->hid_get_raw_report(dev, dev->battery_report_id,
> - buf, 2,
> - dev->battery_report_type);
> + ret = hid_hw_raw_request(dev, dev->battery_report_id, buf, 2,
> + dev->battery_report_type,
> + HID_REQ_GET_REPORT);
>
> if (ret != 2) {
> ret = -ENODATA;
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-sony.c b/drivers/hid/hid-sony.c
> index 2bd3f13..b51db79 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-sony.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-sony.c
> @@ -810,7 +810,8 @@ static int sixaxis_set_operational_usb(struct hid_device *hdev)
> if (!buf)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - ret = hdev->hid_get_raw_report(hdev, 0xf2, buf, 17, HID_FEATURE_REPORT);
> + ret = hid_hw_raw_request(hdev, 0xf2, buf, 17, HID_FEATURE_REPORT,
> + HID_REQ_GET_REPORT);
>
> if (ret < 0)
> hid_err(hdev, "can't set operational mode\n");
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hidraw.c b/drivers/hid/hidraw.c
> index cb0137b..4b2dc95 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hidraw.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hidraw.c
> @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ static ssize_t hidraw_get_report(struct file *file, char __user *buffer, size_t
>
> dev = hidraw_table[minor]->hid;
>
> - if (!dev->hid_get_raw_report) {
> + if (!dev->ll_driver->raw_request) {
> ret = -ENODEV;
> goto out;
> }
> @@ -216,14 +216,15 @@ static ssize_t hidraw_get_report(struct file *file, char __user *buffer, size_t
>
> /*
> * Read the first byte from the user. This is the report number,
> - * which is passed to dev->hid_get_raw_report().
> + * which is passed to hid_hw_raw_request().
> */
> if (copy_from_user(&report_number, buffer, 1)) {
> ret = -EFAULT;
> goto out_free;
> }
>
> - ret = dev->hid_get_raw_report(dev, report_number, buf, count, report_type);
> + ret = hid_hw_raw_request(dev, report_number, buf, count, report_type,
> + HID_REQ_GET_REPORT);
>
> if (ret < 0)
> goto out_free;
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c b/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c
> index 923ff81..f57de7f 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c
> @@ -1003,7 +1003,6 @@ static int i2c_hid_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>
> hid->driver_data = client;
> hid->ll_driver = &i2c_hid_ll_driver;
> - hid->hid_get_raw_report = i2c_hid_get_raw_report;
> hid->hid_output_raw_report = i2c_hid_output_raw_report;
> hid->dev.parent = &client->dev;
> ACPI_COMPANION_SET(&hid->dev, ACPI_COMPANION(&client->dev));
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/uhid.c b/drivers/hid/uhid.c
> index f5a2b19..12439e1 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/uhid.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/uhid.c
> @@ -404,7 +404,6 @@ static int uhid_dev_create(struct uhid_device *uhid,
> hid->uniq[63] = 0;
>
> hid->ll_driver = &uhid_hid_driver;
> - hid->hid_get_raw_report = uhid_hid_get_raw;

I'll queue a followup patch on top of this that completely removes
uhid_hid_get_raw(), as it's unused now.

--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/