[PATCH 4/4] x86: Fix order of warning messages when ftrace modifies code

[Petr Mladek]

The colon at the end of the printk message suggests that it should get printed
before the details printed by ftrace_bug().

When touching the line, let's use the preferred pr_warn() macro as suggested
by checkpatch.pl.

Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c b/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c
index 525a9f954c8b..ad7c38f5206b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c
@@ -622,8 +622,8 @@ void ftrace_replace_code(int enable)
 	return;
 
  remove_breakpoints:
+	pr_warn("Failed on %s (%d):\n", report, count);
 	ftrace_bug(ret, rec ? rec->ip : 0);
-	printk(KERN_WARNING "Failed on %s (%d):\n", report, count);
 	for_ftrace_rec_iter(iter) {
 		int err;
 
-- 
1.8.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/