Re: [PATCH] of_mdio: fix phy interrupt passing

From: Florian Fainelli
Date: Mon Feb 17 2014 - 12:49:13 EST


2014-02-17 9:42 GMT-08:00 Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On 17/02/14 17:26, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>
>> Hi Ben,
>>
>> 2014-02-17 8:29 GMT-08:00 Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>>
>>> The of_mdiobus_register_phy() is not setting phy->irq this causing
>>> some drivers to incorrectly assume that the PHY does not have an
>>> IRQ associated with it or install an interrupt handler for the
>>> PHY.
>>>
>>> Simplify the code setting irq and set the phy->irq at the same
>>> time so that the case if mdio->irq is not NULL is easier to read.
>>
>>
>> The real bug fix, which is not properly explained here, is that
>> irq_of_parse_and_map() should return values > 0 when the interrupt is
>> valid, so this makes me wonder why we are not propagating the return
>> value from irq_of_parse_and_map() in case the call to
>> of_irq_parse_one() does return something non-zero?
>
>
> No, the first issue is phy->dev never gets set, which causes the
> issue. The cleanup was added as it seemed easier to put it in with
> this.

Ok, that really needs to be mentioned in the commit message, even
being quite familiar (and possibly dumb too) with the code, I could
not figure this out by reading your patch.

>
> I think phy->irq is already initialised to PHY_POLL and thus there
> is no need to set phy->irq if the irq_of_parse_and_map() fails.

That is correct, the reason why I introduced 7d97637 ("net: of_mdio:
do not overwrite PHY interrupt configuration") was that you are also
allowed to change the irq type before calling into
of_mdiobus_register(), so we want to preserve other irq values being
set here, such as PHY_IGNORE_INTERRUPT. Your patch does take care of
that since it only overrides the irq in case we could parse it.
--
Florian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/