[PATCH 09/32] perf tests x86: Introduce perf_regs_load function
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Date: Tue Feb 18 2014 - 16:17:48 EST
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
Introducing perf_regs_load function, which is going to be used for dwarf
unwind test in following patches.
It takes single argument as a pointer to the regs dump buffer and
populates it with current registers values.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1389098853-14466-5-git-send-email-jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/perf/arch/x86/Makefile | 1 +
tools/perf/arch/x86/include/perf_regs.h | 2 +
tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/regs_load.S | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 95 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/regs_load.S
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/Makefile b/tools/perf/arch/x86/Makefile
index 8801fe02f206..1cbef7338f84 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/Makefile
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/Makefile
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ LIB_OBJS += $(OUTPUT)arch/$(ARCH)/util/dwarf-regs.o
endif
ifndef NO_LIBUNWIND
LIB_OBJS += $(OUTPUT)arch/$(ARCH)/util/unwind.o
+LIB_OBJS += $(OUTPUT)arch/$(ARCH)/tests/regs_load.o
endif
LIB_OBJS += $(OUTPUT)arch/$(ARCH)/util/header.o
LIB_OBJS += $(OUTPUT)arch/$(ARCH)/util/tsc.o
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/include/perf_regs.h b/tools/perf/arch/x86/include/perf_regs.h
index e84ca76aae77..f3435d62aec1 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/include/perf_regs.h
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/include/perf_regs.h
@@ -5,6 +5,8 @@
#include "../../util/types.h"
#include <asm/perf_regs.h>
+void perf_regs_load(u64 *regs);
+
#ifndef HAVE_ARCH_X86_64_SUPPORT
#define PERF_REGS_MASK ((1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_32_MAX) - 1)
#else
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/regs_load.S b/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/regs_load.S
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..99167bf644ea
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/regs_load.S
@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
+
+#include <linux/linkage.h>
+
+#define AX 0
+#define BX 1 * 8
+#define CX 2 * 8
+#define DX 3 * 8
+#define SI 4 * 8
+#define DI 5 * 8
+#define BP 6 * 8
+#define SP 7 * 8
+#define IP 8 * 8
+#define FLAGS 9 * 8
+#define CS 10 * 8
+#define SS 11 * 8
+#define DS 12 * 8
+#define ES 13 * 8
+#define FS 14 * 8
+#define GS 15 * 8
+#define R8 16 * 8
+#define R9 17 * 8
+#define R10 18 * 8
+#define R11 19 * 8
+#define R12 20 * 8
+#define R13 21 * 8
+#define R14 22 * 8
+#define R15 23 * 8
+
+.text
+#ifdef HAVE_ARCH_X86_64_SUPPORT
+ENTRY(perf_regs_load)
+ movq %rax, AX(%rdi)
+ movq %rbx, BX(%rdi)
+ movq %rcx, CX(%rdi)
+ movq %rdx, DX(%rdi)
+ movq %rsi, SI(%rdi)
+ movq %rdi, DI(%rdi)
+ movq %rbp, BP(%rdi)
+
+ leaq 8(%rsp), %rax /* exclude this call. */
+ movq %rax, SP(%rdi)
+
+ movq 0(%rsp), %rax
+ movq %rax, IP(%rdi)
+
+ movq $0, FLAGS(%rdi)
+ movq $0, CS(%rdi)
+ movq $0, SS(%rdi)
+ movq $0, DS(%rdi)
+ movq $0, ES(%rdi)
+ movq $0, FS(%rdi)
+ movq $0, GS(%rdi)
+
+ movq %r8, R8(%rdi)
+ movq %r9, R9(%rdi)
+ movq %r10, R10(%rdi)
+ movq %r11, R11(%rdi)
+ movq %r12, R12(%rdi)
+ movq %r13, R13(%rdi)
+ movq %r14, R14(%rdi)
+ movq %r15, R15(%rdi)
+ ret
+ENDPROC(perf_regs_load)
+#else
+ENTRY(perf_regs_load)
+ push %edi
+ movl 8(%esp), %edi
+ movl %eax, AX(%edi)
+ movl %ebx, BX(%edi)
+ movl %ecx, CX(%edi)
+ movl %edx, DX(%edi)
+ movl %esi, SI(%edi)
+ pop %eax
+ movl %eax, DI(%edi)
+ movl %ebp, BP(%edi)
+
+ leal 4(%esp), %eax /* exclude this call. */
+ movl %eax, SP(%edi)
+
+ movl 0(%esp), %eax
+ movl %eax, IP(%edi)
+
+ movl $0, FLAGS(%edi)
+ movl $0, CS(%edi)
+ movl $0, SS(%edi)
+ movl $0, DS(%edi)
+ movl $0, ES(%edi)
+ movl $0, FS(%edi)
+ movl $0, GS(%edi)
+ ret
+ENDPROC(perf_regs_load)
+#endif
--
1.8.1.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/