Re: [PATCHv3 2/6] mailbox: Introduce a new common API

[Kumar Gala]

On Feb 15, 2014, at 12:25 PM, Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Introduce common framework for client/protocol drivers and
> controller drivers of Inter-Processor-Communication (IPC).
> 
> Client driver developers should have a look at
> include/linux/mailbox_client.h to understand the part of
> the API exposed to client drivers.
> Similarly controller driver developers should have a look
> at include/linux/mailbox_controller.h
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/mailbox/Makefile           |   4 +
> drivers/mailbox/mailbox.c          | 534 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/mailbox.h            |  17 ++
> include/linux/mailbox_client.h     |  87 ++++++
> include/linux/mailbox_controller.h | 102 +++++++
> 5 files changed, 744 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/mailbox/mailbox.c
> create mode 100644 include/linux/mailbox.h
> create mode 100644 include/linux/mailbox_client.h
> create mode 100644 include/linux/mailbox_controller.h

What’s the intent of trying to provide a unified interface here?  I’m trying to understand what benefit we are going for, I get possibly wanting something to reduce duplication in drivers (help functions, library, etc).  But do we really see benefit in a common interface for clients?

Are we really going to mix a OMAP mailbox controller with a client developed for some other SoC vendor?

- k

-- 
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/