Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] of: reimplement the matching method for __of_match_node()

[Kevin Hao]

On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 02:21:02PM +0800, Kevin Hao wrote:
> +		/*
> +		 * Matching compatible is better than matching type and name,
> +		 * and the specific compatible is better than the general.
> +		 */
> +		if (matches->compatible[0] &&
> +			 __of_device_is_compatible_score(node,
> +						matches->compatible, &score))
> +			score = INT_MAX - 4 * score;

It seems that we also need to adjust the above as what we do for the type
and name. The v3 is coming.

Thanks,
Kevin

Attachment: pgpaSrDFLUHpM.pgp
Description: PGP signature