Re: perf test failure on 3.14rc3

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Thu Feb 20 2014 - 03:54:32 EST


On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:31:42PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> 1: vmlinux symtab matches kallsyms : Ok
> 2: detect open syscall event : Ok
> 3: detect open syscall event on all cpus : Ok
> 4: read samples using the mmap interface : Ok
> 5: parse events tests : Warning: function __le16_to_cpup not defined
> Warning: function __le16_to_cpup not defined
> Warning: function __le16_to_cpup not defined
> Warning: bad op token {
> Warning: bad op token {
> Warning: bad op token {
> Warning: bad op token {
> Warning: function is_writable_pte not defined
> Warning: function scsi_trace_parse_cdb not defined
> Warning: function scsi_trace_parse_cdb not defined
> Warning: function scsi_trace_parse_cdb not defined
> Warning: function scsi_trace_parse_cdb not defined
> Warning: unknown op '->'
> Warning: function jiffies_to_msecs not defined
> Warning: function jiffies_to_msecs not defined
> Warning: unknown op '{'
> Warning: unknown op '{'
> Ok
> 6: x86 rdpmc test : Ok
> 7: Validate PERF_RECORD_* events & perf_sample fields : Ok
> 8: Test perf pmu format parsing : Ok
> 9: Test dso data interface : Ok
> 10: roundtrip evsel->name check : Ok
> 11: Check parsing of sched tracepoints fields : Ok
> 12: Generate and check syscalls:sys_enter_open event fields: Ok
> 13: struct perf_event_attr setup : Ok
> 14: Test matching and linking multiple hists : Ok
> 15: Try 'use perf' in python, checking link problems : FAILED!
> 16: Test breakpoint overflow signal handler : Ok
> 17: Test breakpoint overflow sampling : Ok
> 18: Test number of exit event of a simple workload : Ok
> 19: Test software clock events have valid period values : Ok
> 20: Test converting perf time to TSC : Ok
> 21: Test object code reading : FAILED!
> 22: Test sample parsing : Ok
> 23: Test using a dummy software event to keep tracking : Ok
> 24: Test parsing with no sample_id_all bit set : Ok
>
>
> I see '5' failing in similar ways in 3.13 too, so it's been broken
> for a while.

We'll have to ask acme and jolsa, I'm sure I've never looked at that
before.

> Is 21 due to CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE perhaps ?
> Might that also explain why perf top isn't showing me kernel
> function names any more ?

There were some KASLR fails, but I thought most of those were cured, I
think Adrian was involved.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/