Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] timerfd: Factor out timer-type unspecific timerfd_expire()

From: Alexey Perevalov
Date: Fri Feb 21 2014 - 02:05:01 EST


On 02/21/2014 08:13 AM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:52:03AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
From: Anton Vorontsov <anton@xxxxxxxxxx>

There is nothing hrtimer-specific inside the timerfd_tmrproc(), except
the function prototype. We're about to add other timer types, so factor
out generic timerfd_expire() helper from timerfd_tmrproc().
This changelog is completely useless. How is timerfd_tmrproc, which is
not a function but a function pointer, related to the patch?

Moving duplicated code to a common function is nice, but ....
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Alexey Perevalov <a.perevalov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
...
Warnings are there to be ignored and testing of user space
interfaces after a change is overrated, right?

Aside of that you just blindly copied the original code w/o fixing up
the now unnecessary line breaks.
Alexey,

While I appreciate the desire to be careful with authorship and stuff,
please remove my name as an author of this patch -- the current code has
nothing to do with my original work, and I surely don't want to take any
responsibility for it. This is a common practice if you modify someone's
patch to a great extend.

Thomas is bashing the thing, which has my name on it; although _my_ patch
did not produce any warnings, came with a completely different changelog,
and served completely different purposes.
Sorry, it was introduced by me, while rebasing.


Instead of rushing with resending yet another series, please actually read
Thomas' review.

Thanks,

Anton




--
Best regards,
Alexey Perevalov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/