On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:52:03AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:Sorry, it was introduced by me, while rebasing.
...From: Anton Vorontsov <anton@xxxxxxxxxx>This changelog is completely useless. How is timerfd_tmrproc, which is
There is nothing hrtimer-specific inside the timerfd_tmrproc(), except
the function prototype. We're about to add other timer types, so factor
out generic timerfd_expire() helper from timerfd_tmrproc().
not a function but a function pointer, related to the patch?
Moving duplicated code to a common function is nice, but ....
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Alexey Perevalov <a.perevalov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Warnings are there to be ignored and testing of user spaceAlexey,
interfaces after a change is overrated, right?
Aside of that you just blindly copied the original code w/o fixing up
the now unnecessary line breaks.
While I appreciate the desire to be careful with authorship and stuff,
please remove my name as an author of this patch -- the current code has
nothing to do with my original work, and I surely don't want to take any
responsibility for it. This is a common practice if you modify someone's
patch to a great extend.
Thomas is bashing the thing, which has my name on it; although _my_ patch
did not produce any warnings, came with a completely different changelog,
and served completely different purposes.
Instead of rushing with resending yet another series, please actually read
Thomas' review.
Thanks,
Anton