Re: [PATCH RFC] usb: gadget: Add xilinx axi usb2 device support

From: Mark Rutland
Date: Fri Feb 21 2014 - 08:57:29 EST


On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 01:41:03PM +0000, Michal Simek wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> On 02/21/2014 01:04 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 06:23:13PM +0000, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 03:10:45PM +0530, Subbaraya Sundeep Bhatta wrote:
> >>> This patch adds xilinx axi usb2 device driver support
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Subbaraya Sundeep Bhatta <sbhatta@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>> .../devicetree/bindings/usb/xilinx_usb.txt | 21 +
> >>> drivers/usb/gadget/Kconfig | 14 +
> >>> drivers/usb/gadget/Makefile | 1 +
> >>> drivers/usb/gadget/xilinx_udc.c | 2045 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >>> 4 files changed, 2081 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/xilinx_usb.txt
> >>> create mode 100644 drivers/usb/gadget/xilinx_udc.c
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/xilinx_usb.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/xilinx_usb.txt
> >>> new file mode 100644
> >>> index 0000000..acf03ab
> >>> --- /dev/null
> >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/xilinx_usb.txt
> >>> @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
> >>> +Xilinx AXI USB2 device controller
> >>> +
> >>> +Required properties:
> >>> +- compatible : Should be "xlnx,axi-usb2-device-4.00.a"
> >
> > Is "axi-usb2-device" the official device name?
>
> It is the name of IP which Xilinx have and we are using names in this format.
>
>
> >>> +- reg : Physical base address and size of the Axi USB2
> >>> + device registers map.
> >>> +- interrupts : Property with a value describing the interrupt
> >>> + number.
> >
> > Does the device only have a single interrupt?
>
> I believe so.
>
>
> >>> +- interrupt-parent : Must be core interrupt controller
> >
> > Is this strictly necessary?
>
> I am not sure what do you mean by that. If you mean that interrupt-parent
> can be written to the root of DTS file then we can setup system with more
> interrupt controllers that's why it is required.

At which point it's not a required property of the node...

> If we can point to standard interrupt description then please point me to
> exact description you would like to see here and we can change it.

Unfortunately I'm not aware of a generic interrupts document. I just
don't see the point in each document listing interrupt-parent as a
requiredp roeprty when it's not. That said this is a trivial detail and
not really a blocker.

Cheers,
Mark
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/