Re: [PATCH] mm: per-thread vma caching

From: Davidlohr Bueso
Date: Fri Feb 21 2014 - 15:57:34 EST


On Fri, 2014-02-21 at 10:13 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > From: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@xxxxxx>
> >
> > This patch is a continuation of efforts trying to optimize find_vma(),
> > avoiding potentially expensive rbtree walks to locate a vma upon faults.
>
> Ok, so I like this one much better than the previous version.

Btw, one concern I had is regarding seqnum overflows... if such
scenarios should happen we'd end up potentially returning bogus vmas and
getting bus errors and other sorts of issues. So we'd have to flush the
caches, but, do we care? I guess on 32bit systems it could be a bit more
possible to trigger given enough forking.

Thanks,
Davidlohr

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/