Re: [PATCH] x86, kaslr: randomize module base load address

[Andrew Morton]

On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 13:18:26 -0800 "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 02/21/2014 01:15 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >>
> >> I've been slapped down for adding more config options in the past, and
> >> I think it's unlikely that people using CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE won't
> >> want the modules base randomized too. I think this is a safe default,
> >> but if you see it as a requirement, I can change it.
> > 
> > I think there were issues with some embedded systems where it's
> > hard/impossible to provide/alter boot parameters.
> > 
> 
> We now allow kernel parameters to be compiled into the kernel image for
> that reason.

We do?  What's that Kconfig variable called?

We have a few (inconsistently named) things like

CONFIG_X86_BOOTPARAM_MEMORY_CORRUPTION_CHECK=y
CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_HOTPLUG_CPU0=y
CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_HARDLOCKUP_PANIC=y
CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_HARDLOCKUP_PANIC_VALUE=1
CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_SOFTLOCKUP_PANIC=y
CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_SOFTLOCKUP_PANIC_VALUE=1
CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_HUNG_TASK_PANIC=y
CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_HUNG_TASK_PANIC_VALUE=1
CONFIG_DEBUG_BOOT_PARAMS=y
CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_BOOTPARAM=y
CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_BOOTPARAM_VALUE=1
CONFIG_SECURITY_APPARMOR_BOOTPARAM_VALUE=1

which presumably become obsolete with a general
feed-this-string-to-the-kernel feature?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/