Re: [PATCH RFC v1 3/3] ARM hibernation / suspend-to-disk

From: Russ Dill
Date: Sat Feb 22 2014 - 01:48:52 EST


On 02/21/2014 08:37 PM, Sebastian Capella wrote:
> Quoting Sebastian Capella (2014-02-21 15:59:11)
>> - Cyril Chemparathy as his email is bouncing back to me.
>>
>> Quoting Sebastian Capella (2014-02-21 10:39:56)
>>> Quoting Lorenzo Pieralisi (2014-02-20 08:27:55)
>>>>>>> + cpu_switch_mm(idmap_pgd, &init_mm);
>> [ ... ]
>>> I can try removing it and seeing if there are side effects.
>>
>> FYI, It's definitely hanging with this removed, still looking.
>
> I see when we reach this call, the 1st level page table @ TTBR0 is located
> at different memory locations each run (expected). If we omit the
> cpu_switch_mm we're corrupting the page table causing the observed
> intermittent failures. I believe these match the corruption you expected.
>
> The reason this doesn't happen when I leave the call is that idmap_pgd
> is always at the same memory location. I expect this is because it's
> allocated during init. I've seen the same address 50/50 times for
> idmap_pgd. I don't think it is correct to rely on this behavior.
>
> Would it be appropriate to use the swapper_pg_dir directly in place
> of idmap_pgd?
> - I do not see any modification to the swapper_pg_dir contents in the
> code that would change from init time.
> - swapper_pg_dir is always at the same offset.
>
> Ideally we should have no issue with overwriting it with identical data.
>
> I've run a couple hundred test loops using swapper_pg_dir and so far
> there are no failures.

If there is worry about this, you could setup a page mapping in a
__nosave region, preventing it from being overwritten.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/