Re: [PATCH] [RFC] time: Improve negative offset handling in timekeeping_inject_offset

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Fri, 21 Feb 2014, John Stultz wrote:
> But yes, we can just leave it as is, and it is a bit academic. But

To be honest, I was mostly arguing due to the academic nature. :)

The important point is that we restrict it to -1e9 < tv_nsec <
1e9. The signed/unsigned combos are not that interesting as long as
our internal helpers cope nicely with that.

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/