Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add maintainers for arm64 acpi

[Graeme Gregory]

On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 10:23:16AM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 02:15:45AM +0000, Graeme Gregory wrote:
> > +ACPI ARM64
> 
> That's a pretty broad statement for a single file. Is it core support,
> architected peripherals, SoC?
> 
Hi Catalin would changing the title to ACPI ARM64 Core Support be better
in your mind. I do intend for the maintainership to cover just the
plat/arm-core.c file.

Graeme

> > +M:	Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > +M:	Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > +S:	Supported
> > +L:	linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > +F:	drivers/acpi/plat/arm-core.c
> 
> This patch should be part of the series introducing the arm-core.c file
> and it will be ACKed (or NAKed) following review. We can't really commit
> maintainers to a file which does not exist in mainline and while there is
> still feedback to be addressed. It's like a blank cheque.
> 
> -- 
> Catalin
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/