Re: [patch 04/11] mm, memcg: add tunable for oom reserves

[David Rientjes]

On Wed, 5 Mar 2014, Andrew Morton wrote:

> > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > @@ -315,6 +315,9 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
> >  	/* OOM-Killer disable */
> >  	int		oom_kill_disable;
> >  
> > +	/* reserves for handling oom conditions, protected by res.lock */
> > +	unsigned long long	oom_reserve;
> 
> Units?  bytes, I assume.
> 

Yes, fixed.

> >  	/* set when res.limit == memsw.limit */
> >  	bool		memsw_is_minimum;
> >  
> > @@ -5936,6 +5939,51 @@ static int mem_cgroup_oom_control_write(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css,
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static int mem_cgroup_resize_oom_reserve(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> > +					 unsigned long long new_limit)
> > +{
> > +	struct res_counter *res = &memcg->res;
> > +	u64 limit, usage;
> > +	int ret = 0;
> 
> The code mixes u64's and unsigned long longs in inexplicable ways. 
> Suggest using u64 throughout.
> 

Ok!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/