Re: [PATCH 0/7] Cpuidle: Minor fixes

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 01:46:25 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, February 24, 2014 08:29:30 AM Tuukka Tikkanen wrote:
> > This set of patches makes some minor changes to menu governor and the poll
> > idle state.
> > 
> > Patch 1 is simply a rename of a variable to make the name better represent
> > the contained information.
> > 
> > Patch 2 fixes calculating actual residency in cases where the entered state
> > is different from the state decided by the menu governor.
> > 
> > Patch 3 makes sure the menu governor timer coefficients are not updated
> > with values that might cause a coefficient to reach a value greater than
> > unity.
> > 
> > Patch 4 fixes calculation actual residency in cases where the entered state
> > does not support measuring residency. In such cases the residency time
> > is taken from time remaining until next timer expiry. The timer is expected
> > to go off at the start of exit latency, not after it. Therefore the exit
> > latency must not be substracted from the assumed value.
> > 
> > Patch 5 moves the performance multiplier based comparison out of the state
> > selection loop by changing it into a latency requirement. This allows
> > using a generic state selection function accepting only (duration, latency)
> > tuple as input. The change is possible by noting that performance multiplier
> > is used only to check for a minimum predicted idle duration to exit latency
> > ratio. As predicted idle duration is a constant for the loop, the maximum
> > allowed latency can be calculated outside of the loop.
> > 
> > Patch 6 prevents using negative values from tick_nohz_get_sleep_length()
> > in the menu governor. If unchecked, the negative values are used as huge
> > unsigned values. Negative values occur fairly often (e.g. on x86_64 I've
> > seen this happen several times per minute) on a busy system, allowing
> > the deepest state to win the selection while the shallowest should be picked.
> > 
> > Patch 7 adds CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_VALID to poll_idle. I do not know of any
> > platfrom where cpu_relax() would break ktime_get() and in fact poll_idle
> > uses ktime_get itself.
> > (Note: poll_idle updates dev->last_residency for some reason. Does it ever
> > get called without going through cpuidle_enter_state, which will overwrite
> > the value? Even if some state redirects to this state, the call will
> > eventually return to the framework. The redundant time measurement could
> > be removed, unless there is some obscure way of getting called on some
> > platform that I am unable to figure out.)
> > 
> > Tuukka Tikkanen (7):
> >   Cpuidle: rename expected_us to next_timer_us in menu governor
> >   Cpuidle: Use actual state latency in menu governor
> >   Cpuidle: Ensure menu coefficients stay within domain
> >   Cpuidle: Do not substract exit latency from assumed sleep length
> >   Cpuidle: Move perf multiplier calculation out of the selection loop
> >   Cpuidle: Deal with timer expiring in the past
> >   Cpuidle: poll state can measure residency
> > 
> >  drivers/cpuidle/driver.c         |    2 +-
> >  drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c |   85 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> >  2 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> 
> I'm queuing this series up for 3.15.

Patch [6/7] dropped, because of the Len's objection.

Thanks!

-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/