Re: [PATCH] [RESEND] score: remove unused CPU_SCORE7 Kconfig parameter

[Lennox Wu]

Because I don't think droping it is meaningful, since it will be used.
Moreover, the symbol never affect other architectures or subsystems.
I feel that is not good to brother people to process the unimportant patch.

Best,
Lennox


2014-03-09 4:00 GMT+08:00 Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> Lennox,
>
> On Sat, 2014-03-08 at 14:34 +0800, Lennox Wu wrote:
>> According to my record, I had told you we have another
>> processor(2013/11/4), hence, we need the parameter.
>> We just wirte it done first. Do you remember it?
>
> In https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/12/76 I already reported that this
> Kconfig symbol was unused. Why can't it be dropped and re-added when
> code is added to the tree that actually uses it?
>
>
> Paul Bolle
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/