[PATCH 2/2] brcmsmac: update comment to reflect the code

[Emil Goode]

The brcms_attach function is defined as static but the comment is
saying that it should not be static or gcc will issue a warning.
I believe we can remove the comment as I don't se a problem with
this function being defined as static.

Signed-off-by: Emil Goode <emilgoode@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/mac80211_if.c |    6 ------
 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/mac80211_if.c b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/mac80211_if.c
index 93598cd..8c5fa4e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/mac80211_if.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/mac80211_if.c
@@ -1092,12 +1092,6 @@ static int ieee_hw_init(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
  * Attach to the WL device identified by vendor and device parameters.
  * regs is a host accessible memory address pointing to WL device registers.
  *
- * brcms_attach is not defined as static because in the case where no bus
- * is defined, wl_attach will never be called, and thus, gcc will issue
- * a warning that this function is defined but not used if we declare
- * it as static.
- *
- *
  * is called in brcms_bcma_probe() context, therefore no locking required.
  */
 static struct brcms_info *brcms_attach(struct bcma_device *pdev)
-- 
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/