RE: linux rdma 3.14 merge plans

From: Devesh Sharma
Date: Mon Mar 10 2014 - 05:00:51 EST


Thanks Roland,
My response is inline below.

-Regards
Devesh
-----Original Message-----
From: roland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:roland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Roland Dreier
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2014 1:02 AM
To: Devesh Sharma
Cc: Nicholas A. Bellinger; Or Gerlitz; Hefty Sean; linux-rdma; Martin K. Petersen; target-devel; Sagi Grimberg; linux-kernel
Subject: Re: linux rdma 3.14 merge plans

Sure, no problem.

Do you have a git tree with the latest versions of all the changes you want for 3.15 in a branch? That would be helpful as I catch up on applying things, so that I don't miss anything.
[DS]: Yes, I do have a cloned copy of your git tree migrated to for-next branch, with all the patches we have submitted to linux-rdma (patch series: [PATCH for-next 00/17] ocrdma driver code sync-up). However, it is on my local server.
In case of urgency (and if OFED EWG permits me) I can set it up on benay dot openfabrics dot org, for now and give a link to pull.

If you don't have one, taking a little time to set one up on github or wherever would be nice. You can base your set of changes on Linus's latest tree.
[DS]: Currently we do not have such tree. I will have to discuss within my organization on how to go about this request.

Thanks!
Roland

On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:07 PM, Devesh Sharma <Devesh.Sharma@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Roland,
>
> Is it okay to send next series of patches even if previous series is not accepted yet in your tree? Off-course I will cut patches on top of previous series of patches.
>
> -Regards
> Devesh
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-rdma-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:linux-rdma-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Nicholas A.
> Bellinger
> Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 12:34 AM
> To: Roland Dreier
> Cc: Or Gerlitz; Hefty Sean; linux-rdma; Martin K. Petersen;
> target-devel; Sagi Grimberg; linux-kernel
> Subject: Re: linux rdma 3.14 merge plans
>
> On Wed, 2014-03-05 at 07:18 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger
>> <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > That all said, do you have an objection wrt taking this bits
>> > through target-pending..? Given the dependencies involved, that
>> > would seem the most logical path to take.
>>
>> Perhaps not surprisingly, I would prefer to get a chance to review a
>> major change to the core RDMA midlayer rather than having you merge
>> it through your tree. So yes I do object. Please give me a chance
>> to review and merge it. I am working on that this week.
>>
>
> Great. We'll be looking for a response by the end of the week.
>
> Otherwise if you end up not having time, we'd still like to move forward for v3.15 given the amount of review the series has already gotten on the list.
>
> Thank you,
>
> --nab
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma"
> in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo
> info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/