Re: [PATCH v2] x86: Remove compat vdso support

From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Tue Mar 11 2014 - 05:36:42 EST


On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 9:10 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I suspect that a lot of 32-bit Linux users want syscall and/or
> sysenter, and Stefani certainly wants the fast timing that the vDSO
> can provide. Also, presumably __kernel_sigreturn serves some purpose
> :)

Are we talking about the same thing at all?

We're talking about the *COMPAT* vdso, right?

The one you were just told Fedora had never _ever_ enabled? And you
are seriously arguing that "peformance" is relevant, while at the same
time trying to claim that the fact that it DOES NOT WORK on SuSE -
which *did* enable it - is not such a big deal, and that we should
ignore the "don't break user space" rule?

Seriously?

WTF?

Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/