Re: [PATCH 2/4] devfreq: exynos4: Use common ppmu driver and get ppmu address from dt data

From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Date: Wed Mar 12 2014 - 10:58:02 EST

Next message: Nicolas Ferre: "Re: [PATCH RESEND] usb: at91-udc: fix irq and iomem resource retrieval"
Previous message: Johannes Weiner: "Re: [patch 4/8] mm: memcg: push !mm handling out to page cache charge function"
In reply to: Chanwoo Choi: "[PATCH 2/4] devfreq: exynos4: Use common ppmu driver and get ppmu address from dt data"
Next in thread: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz: "Re: [PATCH 0/4] devfreq: exynos4: Support dt and use common ppmu driver"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi,

On Wednesday, March 12, 2014 08:48:00 PM Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> This patch use common ppmu driver of exynos_ppmu.c driver instead of individual
> function related to PPC block and get ppmu address from dt data by using dt
> helper function (of_iomap). And then this patch delete duplicate defined
> structure/enum.
>
> For example,a
> busfreq@106A0000 {
> compatible = "samsung,exynos4x12-busfreq";
> reg = <0x106A0000 0x2000>, <0x106B0000 0x2000>;
> regs-name = "PPMU_DMC0", "PPMU_DMC1";
> };

DT bindings need to be documented in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/.

> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/devfreq/exynos/exynos4_bus.c | 237 +++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+), 109 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/exynos/exynos4_bus.c b/drivers/devfreq/exynos/exynos4_bus.c
> index 168a7c6..16fb3cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/devfreq/exynos/exynos4_bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/exynos/exynos4_bus.c
> @@ -24,17 +24,19 @@
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> #include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
>
> +#include <mach/map.h>
> +
> +#include "exynos_ppmu.h"
> +#include "exynos4_bus.h"
> +
> /* Exynos4 ASV has been in the mailing list, but not upstreamed, yet. */
> #ifdef CONFIG_EXYNOS_ASV
> extern unsigned int exynos_result_of_asv;
> #endif
>
> -#include <mach/map.h>
> -
> -#include "exynos4_bus.h"
> -
> #define MAX_SAFEVOLT 1200000 /* 1.2V */
>
> enum exynos4_busf_type {
> @@ -45,22 +47,6 @@ enum exynos4_busf_type {
> /* Assume that the bus is saturated if the utilization is 40% */
> #define BUS_SATURATION_RATIO 40
>
> -enum ppmu_counter {
> - PPMU_PMNCNT0 = 0,
> - PPMU_PMCCNT1,
> - PPMU_PMNCNT2,
> - PPMU_PMNCNT3,
> - PPMU_PMNCNT_MAX,
> -};
> -struct exynos4_ppmu {
> - void __iomem *hw_base;
> - unsigned int ccnt;
> - unsigned int event;
> - unsigned int count[PPMU_PMNCNT_MAX];
> - bool ccnt_overflow;
> - bool count_overflow[PPMU_PMNCNT_MAX];
> -};
> -
> enum busclk_level_idx {
> LV_0 = 0,
> LV_1,
> @@ -69,6 +55,13 @@ enum busclk_level_idx {
> LV_4,
> _LV_END
> };
> +
> +enum exynos_ppmu_idx {
> + PPMU_DMC0,
> + PPMU_DMC1,
> + PPMU_END,
> +};
> +
> #define EX4210_LV_MAX LV_2
> #define EX4x12_LV_MAX LV_4
> #define EX4210_LV_NUM (LV_2 + 1)
> @@ -92,7 +85,7 @@ struct busfreq_data {
> struct regulator *vdd_int;
> struct regulator *vdd_mif; /* Exynos4412/4212 only */
> struct busfreq_opp_info curr_oppinfo;
> - struct exynos4_ppmu dmc[2];
> + struct exynos_ppmu ppmu[PPMU_END];
>
> struct notifier_block pm_notifier;
> struct mutex lock;
> @@ -102,12 +95,6 @@ struct busfreq_data {
> unsigned int top_divtable[_LV_END];
> };
>
> -struct bus_opp_table {
> - unsigned int idx;
> - unsigned long clk;
> - unsigned long volt;
> -};
> -
> /* 4210 controls clock of mif and voltage of int */
> static struct bus_opp_table exynos4210_busclk_table[] = {
> {LV_0, 400000, 1150000},
> @@ -525,27 +512,22 @@ static int exynos4x12_set_busclk(struct busfreq_data *data,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -
> static void busfreq_mon_reset(struct busfreq_data *data)
> {
> unsigned int i;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
> - void __iomem *ppmu_base = data->dmc[i].hw_base;
> + for (i = 0; i < PPMU_END; i++) {
> + void __iomem *ppmu_base = data->ppmu[i].hw_base;
>
> - /* Reset PPMU */
> - __raw_writel(0x8000000f, ppmu_base + 0xf010);
> - __raw_writel(0x8000000f, ppmu_base + 0xf050);
> - __raw_writel(0x6, ppmu_base + 0xf000);
> - __raw_writel(0x0, ppmu_base + 0xf100);
> + /* Reset the performance and cycle counters */
> + exynos_ppmu_reset(ppmu_base);
>
> - /* Set PPMU Event */
> - data->dmc[i].event = 0x6;
> - __raw_writel(((data->dmc[i].event << 12) | 0x1),
> - ppmu_base + 0xfc);
> + /* Setup count registers to monitor read/write transactions */
> + data->ppmu[i].event[PPMU_PMNCNT3] = RDWR_DATA_COUNT;
> + exynos_ppmu_setevent(ppmu_base, PPMU_PMNCNT3,
> + data->ppmu[i].event[PPMU_PMNCNT3]);
>
> - /* Start PPMU */
> - __raw_writel(0x1, ppmu_base + 0xf000);
> + exynos_ppmu_start(ppmu_base);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -553,23 +535,20 @@ static void exynos4_read_ppmu(struct busfreq_data *data)
> {
> int i, j;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
> - void __iomem *ppmu_base = data->dmc[i].hw_base;
> - u32 overflow;
> + for (i = 0; i < PPMU_END; i++) {
> + void __iomem *ppmu_base = data->ppmu[i].hw_base;
>
> - /* Stop PPMU */
> - __raw_writel(0x0, ppmu_base + 0xf000);
> + exynos_ppmu_stop(ppmu_base);
>
> /* Update local data from PPMU */
> - overflow = __raw_readl(ppmu_base + 0xf050);
> -
> - data->dmc[i].ccnt = __raw_readl(ppmu_base + 0xf100);
> - data->dmc[i].ccnt_overflow = overflow & (1 << 31);
> -
> - for (j = 0; j < PPMU_PMNCNT_MAX; j++) {
> - data->dmc[i].count[j] = __raw_readl(
> - ppmu_base + (0xf110 + (0x10 * j)));
> - data->dmc[i].count_overflow[j] = overflow & (1 << j);
> + data->ppmu[i].ccnt = __raw_readl(ppmu_base + PPMU_CCNT);
> +
> + for (j = PPMU_PMNCNT0; j < PPMU_PMNCNT_MAX; j++) {
> + if (data->ppmu[i].event[j] == 0)
> + data->ppmu[i].count[j] = 0;
> + else
> + data->ppmu[i].count[j] =
> + exynos_ppmu_read(ppmu_base, j);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -699,66 +678,42 @@ out:
> return err;
> }
>
> -static int exynos4_get_busier_dmc(struct busfreq_data *data)
> +static int exynos4_get_busier_ppmu(struct busfreq_data *data)
> {
> - u64 p0 = data->dmc[0].count[0];
> - u64 p1 = data->dmc[1].count[0];
> -
> - p0 *= data->dmc[1].ccnt;
> - p1 *= data->dmc[0].ccnt;
> -
> - if (data->dmc[1].ccnt == 0)
> - return 0;
> + int i, j;
> + int busy = 0;
> + unsigned int temp = 0;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < PPMU_END; i++) {
> + for (j = PPMU_PMNCNT0; j < PPMU_PMNCNT_MAX; j++) {
> + if (data->ppmu[i].count[j] > temp) {
> + temp = data->ppmu[i].count[j];
> + busy = i;
> + }
> + }
> + }
>
> - if (p0 > p1)
> - return 0;
> - return 1;
> + return busy;
> }
>
> static int exynos4_bus_get_dev_status(struct device *dev,
> struct devfreq_dev_status *stat)
> {
> struct busfreq_data *data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> - int busier_dmc;
> - int cycles_x2 = 2; /* 2 x cycles */
> - void __iomem *addr;
> - u32 timing;
> - u32 memctrl;
> + int busier;
>
> exynos4_read_ppmu(data);
> - busier_dmc = exynos4_get_busier_dmc(data);
> + busier = exynos4_get_busier_ppmu(data);
> stat->current_frequency = data->curr_oppinfo.rate;
>
> - if (busier_dmc)
> - addr = S5P_VA_DMC1;
> - else
> - addr = S5P_VA_DMC0;
> -
> - memctrl = __raw_readl(addr + 0x04); /* one of DDR2/3/LPDDR2 */
> - timing = __raw_readl(addr + 0x38); /* CL or WL/RL values */
> -
> - switch ((memctrl >> 8) & 0xf) {
> - case 0x4: /* DDR2 */
> - cycles_x2 = ((timing >> 16) & 0xf) * 2;
> - break;
> - case 0x5: /* LPDDR2 */
> - case 0x6: /* DDR3 */
> - cycles_x2 = ((timing >> 8) & 0xf) + ((timing >> 0) & 0xf);
> - break;
> - default:
> - pr_err("%s: Unknown Memory Type(%d).\n", __func__,
> - (memctrl >> 8) & 0xf);
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> -
> /* Number of cycles spent on memory access */
> - stat->busy_time = data->dmc[busier_dmc].count[0] / 2 * (cycles_x2 + 2);
> + stat->busy_time = data->ppmu[busier].count[PPMU_PMNCNT3];

I believe that above change should be mentioned in the patch description.

> stat->busy_time *= 100 / BUS_SATURATION_RATIO;
> - stat->total_time = data->dmc[busier_dmc].ccnt;
> + stat->total_time = data->ppmu[busier].ccnt;
>
> /* If the counters have overflown, retry */
> - if (data->dmc[busier_dmc].ccnt_overflow ||
> - data->dmc[busier_dmc].count_overflow[0])
> + if (data->ppmu[busier].ccnt_overflow ||
> + data->ppmu[busier].count_overflow[0])
> return -EAGAIN;
>
> return 0;
> @@ -1028,6 +983,39 @@ static struct of_device_id exynos4_busfreq_id_match[] = {
> },
> };
>
> +static int exynos4_busfreq_parse_dt(struct busfreq_data *data)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = data->dev;
> + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> + int i, ret;
> +
> + if (!np) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Faild to find devicetree node\n");

Failed

> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + /* Maps the memory mapped IO to control PPMU register */
> + for (i = 0; i < PPMU_END; i++) {
> + data->ppmu[i].hw_base = of_iomap(np, i);
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(data->ppmu[i].hw_base)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to map memory region\n");
> + data->ppmu[i].hw_base = NULL;
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto err_iomap;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +err_iomap:
> + for (i = 0; i < PPMU_END; i++) {
> + if (data->ppmu[i].hw_base)
> + iounmap(data->ppmu[i].hw_base);
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static int exynos4_busfreq_get_driver_data(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> @@ -1045,7 +1033,7 @@ static int exynos4_busfreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct busfreq_data *data;
> struct dev_pm_opp *opp;
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> - int err = 0;
> + int i, err = 0;
>
> data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct busfreq_data), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (data == NULL) {
> @@ -1054,10 +1042,16 @@ static int exynos4_busfreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> data->type = exynos4_busfreq_get_driver_data(pdev);
> - data->dmc[0].hw_base = S5P_VA_DMC0;
> - data->dmc[1].hw_base = S5P_VA_DMC1;
> data->pm_notifier.notifier_call = exynos4_busfreq_pm_notifier_event;
> data->dev = dev;
> +
> + /* Parse dt data to get register/regulator */
> + err = exynos4_busfreq_parse_dt(data);
> + if (err < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to parse dt for resource\n");
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> mutex_init(&data->lock);
>
> switch (data->type) {
> @@ -1102,23 +1096,48 @@ static int exynos4_busfreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, data);
>
> - busfreq_mon_reset(data);
> -
> + /* Reigster Exynos4's devfreq instance with 'simple_ondemand' gov */
> data->devfreq = devfreq_add_device(dev, &exynos4_devfreq_profile,
> "simple_ondemand", NULL);
> - if (IS_ERR(data->devfreq))
> - return PTR_ERR(data->devfreq);
> + if (IS_ERR(data->devfreq)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to add devfreq device\n");
> + err = PTR_ERR(data->devfreq);
> + goto err_opp;
> + }
>
> - devfreq_register_opp_notifier(dev, data->devfreq);
> + /*
> + * Start PPMU(Performance Profiling Monitoring Unit) to check
> + * utilization of each IP in the Exynos4 SoC.
> + */
> + busfreq_mon_reset(data);
>
> + /* Register opp_notifier for Exynos4 busfreq */
> + err = devfreq_register_opp_notifier(dev, data->devfreq);
> + if (err < 0) {

This patch adds devfreq_register_opp_notifier() return value checking,
this would be best done in a separate pre-patch.

> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to register opp notifier\n");
> + goto err_notifier_opp;
> + }
> +
> + /* Register pm_notifier for Exynos4 busfreq */
> err = register_pm_notifier(&data->pm_notifier);
> if (err) {
> dev_err(dev, "Failed to setup pm notifier\n");
> - devfreq_remove_device(data->devfreq);

It also adds devfreq_unregister_opp_notifier() call on error which
is (again) best to be handled in separate pre-patch (together with
devfreq_register_opp_notifier() return value checking).

There is also another change in patch #3 which would be best to be
moved to afore-mentioned pre-patch:

- bugfix moving devfreq_unregister_opp_notifier() call from
exynos4_bus_exit() to exynos4_busfreq_remove()

> - return err;
> + goto err_notifier_pm;
> }
>
> return 0;
> +
> +err_notifier_pm:
> + devfreq_unregister_opp_notifier(dev, data->devfreq);
> +err_notifier_opp:
> + devfreq_remove_device(data->devfreq);
> +err_opp:
> + for (i = 0; i < PPMU_END; i++) {
> + if (data->ppmu[i].hw_base)
> + iounmap(data->ppmu[i].hw_base);
> + }

This covers iounmap in the failure path but for handling remove
handler (exynos4_busfreq_remove()) ioumap needs to be done also in
exynos4_bus_exit(). This is currently done in patch #3 and should
be done in this patch instead.

> + return err;
> }
>
> static int exynos4_busfreq_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)

Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Nicolas Ferre: "Re: [PATCH RESEND] usb: at91-udc: fix irq and iomem resource retrieval"
Previous message: Johannes Weiner: "Re: [patch 4/8] mm: memcg: push !mm handling out to page cache charge function"
In reply to: Chanwoo Choi: "[PATCH 2/4] devfreq: exynos4: Use common ppmu driver and get ppmu address from dt data"
Next in thread: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz: "Re: [PATCH 0/4] devfreq: exynos4: Support dt and use common ppmu driver"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]