Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86, vdso32: handle 32 bit vDSO larger one page
From: H. Peter Anvin
Date: Thu Mar 13 2014 - 15:02:52 EST
On 03/13/2014 11:32 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> I don't recall anyone suggesting keeping the name. CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO
> will henceforth be a silly name, since the "compat" mode won't have a
> vdso.
>
Linus suggested it:
> What might be acceptable then is to just keep the old config name, and
> if the COMPAT_VDSO config is enabled, you just disable the non-compat
> vdso. At least that way, presumably any opensuse people would have
> their kernel config continue working.
...
> The consensus was that the default should be no vdso, right? My most
> recent patchset calls it CONFIG_ENABLE_VDSO32_BY_DEFAULT and defaults
> to n.
On any practical system, the vdso needs to be turned on -- the syscall
performance difference is very significant.
>> It is important that anyone who actually cares about performance unsets
>> the option.
>
> Should there be a warning at startup if the option is set?
Possibly. Not sure if anyone will read it.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/