Re: [sched/balance] INFO: possible recursive locking detected
From: Fengguang Wu
Date: Fri Mar 14 2014 - 05:07:03 EST
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 04:46:43PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> On 03/14/2014 03:40 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 03:31:21PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> >> On 03/14/2014 02:48 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 02:26:24PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> >>>> On 03/14/2014 02:16 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> >>>>> Alex,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Here are the test results for branch alexshi/single-balance
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks a lot! Fengguang.
> >>>> Is the nex04 machine 4P*8 core * HT? and are a04/a06 atom box?
> >>>
> >>> nex04 is Nehalem-EX. a04/06 are Atom servers.
> >>>
> >>>> Would you like to share the machine info for nhm8, nhm-white and xps2?
> >>>
> >>> They are all 1S Nehalem PC.
> >>
> >> thanks for explanation! Are these all the machine launched in testing?
> >
> > All the tested cases are
> >
> > /lkp/result/lkp-a04/micro/netperf/120s-200%-SCTP_RR
> > /lkp/result/lkp-a04/micro/netperf/120s-200%-SCTP_STREAM
> > /lkp/result/lkp-a04/micro/netperf/120s-200%-SCTP_STREAM_MANY
> > /lkp/result/lkp-a04/micro/netperf/120s-200%-TCP_CRR
> > /lkp/result/lkp-a04/micro/netperf/120s-200%-TCP_MAERTS
> > /lkp/result/lkp-a04/micro/netperf/120s-200%-TCP_RR
> > /lkp/result/lkp-a04/micro/netperf/120s-200%-TCP_SENDFILE
> > /lkp/result/lkp-a04/micro/netperf/120s-200%-TCP_STREAM
> > /lkp/result/lkp-a04/micro/netperf/120s-200%-UDP_RR
> > /lkp/result/lkp-a06/micro/qperf/600s
> > /lkp/result/lkp-nex04/micro/ebizzy/200%-100-10
> > /lkp/result/nhm-white/sysbench/oltp/600s-100%-1000000
> > /lkp/result/nhm8/micro/dbench/100%
> > /lkp/result/xps2/micro/pigz/100%
> >
>
> Why not add hackbench and bigger machine? :)
Yeah sure, but the machine that runs hackbench boot failed..
Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/