Re: [PATCHv2 4/8] devfreq: exynos4: Fix bug of resource leak and code clean on probe()

[Tomasz Figa]

Hi Chanwoo,

On 13.03.2014 09:17, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> This patch fix bug about resource leak when happening probe fail and code clean
> to add debug message.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   drivers/devfreq/exynos/exynos4_bus.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>   1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/exynos/exynos4_bus.c b/drivers/devfreq/exynos/exynos4_bus.c
> index a2a3a47..152a3e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/devfreq/exynos/exynos4_bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/exynos/exynos4_bus.c
> @@ -1152,8 +1152,11 @@ static int exynos4_busfreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   		dev_err(dev, "Cannot determine the device id %d\n", data->type);
>   		err = -EINVAL;
>   	}
> -	if (err)
> +	if (err) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "Cannot initialize busfreq table %d\n",
> +			     data->type);
>   		return err;
> +	}
>
>   	rcu_read_lock();
>   	opp = dev_pm_opp_find_freq_floor(dev,
> @@ -1176,7 +1179,7 @@ static int exynos4_busfreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   	if (IS_ERR(data->devfreq)) {
>   		dev_err(dev, "Failed to add devfreq device\n");
>   		err = PTR_ERR(data->devfreq);
> -		goto err_opp;
> +		goto err_devfreq;
>   	}
>
>   	/*
> @@ -1185,18 +1188,35 @@ static int exynos4_busfreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   	 */
>   	busfreq_mon_reset(data);
>
> -	devfreq_register_opp_notifier(dev, data->devfreq);
> +	/* Register opp_notifier for Exynos4 busfreq */
> +	err = devfreq_register_opp_notifier(dev, data->devfreq);
> +	if (err < 0) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "Failed to register opp notifier\n");
> +		goto err_notifier_opp;
> +	}
>
> +	/* Register pm_notifier for Exynos4 busfreq */
>   	err = register_pm_notifier(&data->pm_notifier);
>   	if (err) {
>   		dev_err(dev, "Failed to setup pm notifier\n");
> -		devfreq_remove_device(data->devfreq);
> -		return err;
> +		goto err_notifier_pm;
>   	}
>
>   	return 0;
>
> -err_opp:
> +err_notifier_pm:
> +	devfreq_unregister_opp_notifier(dev, data->devfreq);
> +err_notifier_opp:
> +	/*
> +	 * The devfreq_remove_device() would execute finally devfreq->profile
> +	 * ->exit(). To avoid duplicate resource free operation, return directly
> +	 * before executing resource free below 'err_devfreq' goto statement.
> +	 */

I'm not quite sure about this. I believe that in this case 
devfreq->profile->exit() would be exynos4_bus_exit() and all it does is 
devfreq_unregister_opp_notifier(dev, data->devfreq), so all remaining 
resources (regulators, clocks, etc.) would get leaked.

I believe the correct thing to do would be to remove the .exit() 
callback from exynos4_devfreq_profile struct and handle all the clean-up 
here in error path.

Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/