Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] Staging: comedi: convert while loops to timeouts in s626.c
From: Chase Southwood
Date: Fri Mar 14 2014 - 21:43:46 EST
>On Tuesday, March 11, 2014 9:26 AM, Ian Abbott <abbotti@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>On 2014-03-09 04:00, Chase Southwood wrote:
>> This patch changes a handful of while loops to timeouts to prevent
>> infinite looping on hardware failure. A couple such loops are in a
>> function (s626_debi_transfer()) which is called from critical sections,
>> so comedi_timeout() is unusable for them, and an iterative timeout is
>> used instead. For the while loops in a context where comedi_timeout() is
>> allowed, a new callback function, s626_send_dac_eoc(), has been defined
>> to evaluate the conditions that the while loops are testing. The new
>> callback employs a switch statement based on a simple new enum so that
>> it is usable for all of the different conditions tested in while loops
>> in s626_send_dac(). The proper comedi_timeout() calls are then used.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chase Southwood <chase.southwood@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> Ian, here is a version of this patchset employing the enum you recommended.
>> The second patch has been rebased on top of this one.
>>
>> 2: Used comedi_timeout() where appropriate, introduce callback function
>>
>> 3: Updated callback to switch on new enum.>
>
>Reviewed-by: Ian Abbott <abbotti@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>For future reference, for patches affecting a single comedi driver, we
>usually title the patches like this:
>
>staging: comedi: name_of_driver: summary of patch
>
Hi Greg!
I was just writing to inquire whether you were able to add this patch as well as
PATCH 2/2 Propagate timeout errors in s626.c, to your queue in their current state.
I had to resend this patch to you about a week ago because the subject line got
a little messed up, which might have lead to a bit of confusion regarding the 2
patch series, and I wanted to check in to see whether you need me to do anything
further.
Thanks,
Chase
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/