Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] ARM hibernation / suspend-to-disk

From: Russell King - ARM Linux
Date: Sun Mar 16 2014 - 05:48:03 EST


On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 11:32:17AM -0700, Sebastian Capella wrote:
> I've moved to this second implementation. I don't think I understand
> the ramifications enough to add the virt_to_pfn call for arm.

Let's look at the implementations...

#define __pa(x) __virt_to_phys((unsigned long)(x))
static inline phys_addr_t __virt_to_phys(unsigned long x)
{
return (phys_addr_t)x - PAGE_OFFSET + PHYS_OFFSET;
}

So, __pa() returns a phys_addr_t (which may be either 32-bit or 64-bit).

#define virt_to_pfn(kaddr) (__pa(kaddr) >> PAGE_SHIFT)

And that will do an appropriate shift to convert the phys_addr_t to a PFN,
which will be fine to assign to an unsigned long variable.

#define __phys_to_pfn(paddr) ((unsigned long)((paddr) >> PAGE_SHIFT))

This does the same thing, but has an explicit cast.

So, the only difference between the two suggestions is that additional
cast, which has no effect here.

> I've changed one thing. __nosave_end is pointing at the first byte
> not included in the nosave region. I subtracted one from it so that
> we make sure we're referring to the last pfn, and left the pfn
> comparison as you'd suggested.

Yes, that should be safer.

--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: now at 9.7Mbps down 460kbps up... slowly
improving, and getting towards what was expected from it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/