Re: [PATCH v11 01/27] iommu/exynos: do not include removed header

[Cho KyongHo]

On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 17:29:36 +0530, Sachin Kamat wrote:
> On 14 March 2014 17:19, Cho KyongHo <pullip.cho@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> From: Sachin Kamat [mailto:sachin.kamat@xxxxxxxxxx]
> >> Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 7:00 PM
> >>
> >> On 14 March 2014 10:31, Cho KyongHo <pullip.cho@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > Commit 25e9d28d92 (ARM: EXYNOS: remove system mmu initialization from
> >> > exynos tree) removed arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach/sysmmu.h header without
> >> > removing remaining use of it from exynos-iommu driver, thus causing a
> >> > compilation error.
> >> >
> >> > This patch fixes the error by removing respective include line
> >> > from exynos-iommu.c.
> >> >
> >> > CC: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Cho KyongHo <pullip.cho@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> > ---
> >> >  drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c |    3 +--
> >> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c
> >> > index 0740189..4876d35 100644
> >> > --- a/drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c
> >> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c
> >> > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> >> >  #define DEBUG
> >> >  #endif
> >> >
> >> > +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> >>
> >> This change doesn't look related to the patch subject/description.
> >>
> > Yes. But it is simply added without any side-effect.
> > Do you think it should be in a separate patch?.
> > Actually, the added line is a redundant.
> 
> If it is redundant, then you shouldn't be adding it. If it is
> required, then please
> mention about the need in the commit description if not a separate patch.
> 

Ok.

Thanks for the advice.

KyongHo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/